Day 18 – What is Energy – Part 5 - Positive / Negative Energy and Resonance - Part 2

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”

 

This is the second part of my previous blog, please read it for context if you haven’t already.

Now, let me brake down Bashar's statement into smaller pieces, so that we can see what exactly he is implying and supporting - "Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics"

"Everything is energy and that's all there is to it."

Yes, everything can bee seen as energy, but that is a direct decision, a lens we place on reality and see it in a specific way - this statement is not more true than saying "everything is physical substance and that's all there is to it" because we know that energy and physicality are interchangeable, or more accurately, within the equations, they can be defined in relation to each other - this goes both ways.

 

"Match the frequency"

Here Bashar is implying that we have the power to control the frequency that we exist as - this is a very powerful implication, this means that we do not have to be subjective to any energy, this means that we can stop participating with frequency all together and not be dependent to the positive energies, nor fear the negative ones - once we stop our own frequency, as stopping our participation with the mind's energy, any energy / frequency around us will not influence us, because it will not resonate with us, because energy can only resonate with energy, and if we have the ability as Bashar implies to stop our frequency, then we will no longer be enslaved to it, and can take self responsibility and apply ourselves with the practicality and common sense solution as what is best for all life, living not within self interest but within the principle of equality and oneness.

But is this really what Bashar meant to say? I doubt it, yet this can be derived from his words, from the truth of his words, not from his deceptive intention.

So what does he mean? He is implying that we can control the frequency we exist as and match it to our self interest desires, so that we can have a good energetic feeling as the drug that he is pushing, he is acting exactly as a drug pusher, convincing us and justifying why his drug, our addiction, is fine because "it'll make you feel so good"...

Thus, Bashar is in fact supporting our enslavement to energy, as when one exists within energy they are trapped within it, one cannot be in directive principle of oneself when existing within and as energy, thus one cannot be trusted, as at any time another frequency can influence oneself, and effect ones behavior and actions, or when ones positive energy is depleted one will turn to deception and manipulation in order to get that kick of positive energy, thus, creating relationships and communications based on exploitation, as we use each other to get our energy kick, rather than communicate unconditionally without any hidden agendas.

"the reality you want"

Here Bashar is bluntly asking us to go after our self interest - such a statement is irresponsible - what is the reality that we want? Our wants and desires are not aligned with one another, thus if we follow our wants and desires we are sure to create conflict as there would be conflict of interest - consumerism is based on wants and desires, war and arguments are based on defending our wants and desires, slavery is a result of our greedy nature of going after our wants and desires - how can a spiritual guru express such irresponsible words, and even worse, how can his followers not notice this, but instead they blindly follow

Why? Because wouldn't we love it if the world was actually like this, if we could just close our eyes and focus on what we want, and get it without it having any repercussions, consequences and outflows, isn't that what we wish someone could tell us in such a way so we can believe it?

Now, through following Bashar’s message, we can justify our greed, our selfishness, our self interest, and believe that looking out only for ourselves in complete disregard to the rest of existence, which we just happen to be a part of, is fine, and is justified by physics - No, physics doesn't justify any of it, if you look at reality, nothing in nature ever only looks after itself, reality realizes itself as one - look at our physical body, all cells are interconnected and are working together, taking only the nutrients they need and sharing the rest, realizing they are all equal parts of the one system of the human body - there is even an intelligence within them that when they realize they are not serving the body, they will self destruct - and do you know what we call cells that only care for themselves, and only care for their wants, desires and greed - we call them cancer cells - this is what Bashar is promoting, he is supporting humanity to remain a cancer in the body of existence, and a cancer within and towards humanity itself.

He is also supporting capitalism as the manifestation of desire and greed in the name of self interest and profit, where fulfilling ones wants and desires is the basic of the capitalistic / consumerist system.

He is promoting ignorance and disregard to how the physical actually works, where within the current system, which is a duplicate of how we exist within our minds, which is what Bashar is supporting, in which there is such an extent of inequality, a system where for me to get what I want, someone else must suffer, for me to live in bliss someone else must live in hell - this is the result of existing in the energetic polarity of the mind - so why is he promoting it? Does he simply not understand better, or is he simply making a profit out of it, and thus, has his own self interest to care for - and we are all blind because it justifies our own self interest, so we are not really blind as much as we deliberately turn a blind eye - we can now blissfully care only for ourselves, while others suffer the result of our actions, as the consequences of the law of balance, and we can do so within a good positive feeling, believing ourselves to be spiritual… what a con...

" It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics"

This is simply a marketing tool - telling people that your statement is true, that it is scientific, and repeating it in different forms, so that the reader will integrate the information, just as they use mind control in advertisement - once you see something a few times, it becomes a part of you, as well as the energetic charge you had while seeing / reading the advertisement  - so Bashar is writing a hopeful statement, giving us the illusion that we can with just adjusting our thoughts, create and manifest all our desires - this statements makes us feel good, thus we are participating, tapping into, aligning ourselves with that specific positive energy frequency of hope - we are now generators of this frequency, completely oblivious to the outflow of our participation with such energy - as we have now seen that any mind energy is based in self interest, and is within the polarity of positive / negative and thus as we create within ourselves the positive energy of hope, we are simultaneously contributing to all the abuse, suffering and hopelessness in our world.

Now, looking at Bashar's statement, and combining all the above points, it is clear that this statement is a fallacy. We must be willing to see reality for what it is, not what we wish it would be, only through seeing reality and ourselves within self honesty as what we really are, can we correct ourselves, change ourselves, mend our ways, and perhaps, with a lot of hard work and dedication, change how we exist, change how we communicate with ourselves and with each other, change what we accept and allow within ourselves and the world system - though, in order to know what needs to be changed, we must face ourselves, even though what we will see is pure evil, just like when facing the reality of the world what we will see is a tremendous amount of suffering and abuse, and the deeper we look in self honesty, the more we will see our responsibility, our participation and our creation of the world as it exists today.

Realize that the solution is not in energy, energy will always exist through friction / conflict / polarity / separation - the solution must be constructed by and from what we want the end result to look like, and not from broken pieces of what we want to change, which is the cause / source / reason of the problem - thus, the solution must stand in equality, in equilibrium, in stability - energy cannot be a part of it - we must get off the swing, let go of our attachment to energy, and find who we are beyond it, find out what it means to live, to express, to experience, to breathe without an energetic baggage pulling us down.

For those of you who are new to the desteni material, there is a vast amount of information and practical tools for application, as this information is only valid once lived as yourself - so please give yourself the gift of unconditionally investigating the material, and see for yourself who you really are.

 

For very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"

To educate yourself on the energy of the mind as consciousness, "Kryon - My Existential History" explains how energy was used to program the mind

To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course

Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online

Also, Please check out the following Links:

Desteni

Desteni Wiki

Desteni Forum

Desteni I Process

Equal Money System

Journey to Life Group

Eqafe Life Products - Self Help

Creation's Journey to Life

Heaven's Journey to LIfe

Earth's Journey to Life

Day 17 – What is Energy – Part 4 - Positive / Negative Energy and Resonance - Part 1

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”

In my last blog I gave some background about potential and kinetic energy, in order to face this next point - the following quote represents a way of life many people believe in and live by.

"Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics" - Bashar

This point of view is accepted by many, and they have convinced themselves that physics, as the law of nature, is aligned with their belief, using physics legitimize and justify their actions and beliefs, but I'm about to show that this isn't the case - I will show how the law of physics "disapproves" with their approach to life, and even though these believers think themselves to be a force of positivity in the world / reality, physics, if looked at it critically, shows quite the contrary, that their methods, if anything, are harmful and destructive.

I will follow a set of assumptions, based on common sense - if you agree with the assumptions I make, and follow the same line of common sense, you will get to the same conclusion as I have stated above:

1 - Existence is the ultimate "closed system" - It includes everything within it and nothing is excluded, thus, there can be nothing beyond that which exists in existence, thus, the law of conservation of energy must apply in regards to the totality of energy within existence.

2 - The natural law of balance is an existential law, this means that anything in existence obeys the law of balance, there is an equilibrium that is maintained when taking all parts of existence into consideration - what seems to be out of balance in a local scale, in an existential perspective, balances out as everything within existence is interconnected, and thus influences and is influenced by everything in existence. This is nicely explain by what is known as "the butterfly effect" where it is said that a flap of a butterflies wings in one side of the world will create a ripple effect that can cause severe weather conditions on the other side of the world - all in existence is interconnected, nothing can happen without having some form of outflow that will coincide with the law of balance when looking at the greater scale of things.

3 - Everything in existence can be defined in terms of its energy - any physical system / interaction / situation / particle / movement / change - all can be "translated" to energetic terms - having said that we must consider that we, as humanity, as our awareness, are part of existence, we are not excluded from everything that exists, as we too exist within existence, thus, our experience and perception of reality can be translated in terms of energy - where, energy is not only defined by the type of energy, as the form it takes, or the substance it "communicates" with, it is defined by it's frequency, and thus, anything that is expressed in terms of energy can be individualized from the perspective of it's frequency, as the frequency expression of a system / interaction / situation / particle can be seen as its' identity - a clear example is colors - within the spectrum of electromagnetic energy frequencies, there is a small range of "light" that is visible to the human eye, the eye detects the differences of frequency and interprets it as the different colors of the rainbow, the eyes are limited and thus, what we see is but a rough division of frequencies, though it is clear that each frequency stands as an individualized entity - taking this back to Bashar's quote, "Match the frequency of the reality you want" - this implies that reality, and our perception of reality, our view of it, can be defined in terms of energy frequency, and that every experience holds within it a unique frequency, where, different experiences can be grouped and categories, just as with physical energies.

4 - Emotions or feelings are energetic experiences - emotions are defined as bad / negative energetic experience, feelings are defined as good / positive energetic experiences - why do I say it is energy? - we can experience it within ourselves as a movement, as a vibration, as heat, as pain, we experience it within having excessive thoughts and back chats, we experience it as something going on within us, and we are moved by it, we act on it - thus, it is a force experienced within ourselves that creates movement, and thus is considered to be working on us, and thus, just as we the physical energy we have discussed in previous blogs, "mind energy" functions in the same way and obeys the same rules - it really is just as in the simplistically of physical, when a force creates movement or a change we know work is being done, when there is "something going on", any movement or any change we know there is energy at play - thus, when there is "something going on" within ourselves, as we experience it for ourselves, there must be energies at play - we call this inner movement "mind energy" - the energy of the mind, the energy that generates and is generated by emotions, feelings and thoughts as back chat, images, beliefs, fears, memories. Where as all physical energies can be defined in terms of potential and kinetic energies - mind energy can be roughly divided to a dichotomy of positive and negative energies, where in most cases, the experience is actually comprised by layers and layers of sub experiences and thus, both positive and negative energy can be found. And, just as physical energy, which is derived from the physical as using substance to extract energy from it, depleting it from its' life essence as it transforms into another form / part / interaction within the physical, a similar construct happens with mind energy, as the mind resources energy from the human physical body, using the physical to generate energy as the physical body is slowly depleted.

Now, Within conservation of energy, in a closed system, we can assume that the amount of energy in existence is constant, this including of course all substance and basically every thing in existence - the total of everything in existence is constant - we use "conservation of energy" because, as I've stated in my previous blog, science has given energy the highest regard and has "translated" all of reality into energy equations - this of course is aligned with the human mental state, as the mind, as the human experiences reality through the interpretation of the mind, and thus sees everything in terms of energy, as in alignment to ones experience of the world - this goes back to the discussion of the paradigm, where we must always keep in mind the limitation of science being a representation of the human consciousness, and thus, can only see as far as humanity is willing to see.

Within the assumption that all that exists is constant at a large scale of things, from the perspective of the sum of all the types of energy that exist in each moment, and within realizing that all energies include the active energies as kinetic energy, as well as the potential energies as mass energy, as the energy "stored" within each particle of physical substance - we must accept the fact that any change / transformation within any type of energy will create a simultaneous change in another form energy, as to maintain the constant balance of the sum of all energies at play. This will thus be true when discussing mind energy as well, where as any altering / changing / resonating positive energy will create a change / disturbance in negative energy - and within the law of balance, the more positive energy we put in the system, the more negative energy the system will create to balance itself out.

Here it is starting to be clear that our goal would then be to stop existing in the polarity of positive and negative, as we clearly see that within the energetic polarity we cannot help but desire all that we perceive to be "good" and "divine", within believing our energetic experience of it being good, but we have never considered the direct consequence we must endure as all that is experienced as "bad" and "evil" - the solution to this predicament exist outside of the realm of energy - the solution cannot be found in energetic terms because energy within its' nature is a polarity - and thus, to reach equilibrium, where the swing rests at the center point and has no potential and no kinetic energy, we must be willing to give up the experience of swinging on the swing all together - this may sound drastic, but in order to live our lives in true peace and harmony, in equilibrium, in balance, and not in a constant roller coaster between high and low, good and bad, not to endure pain, abuse and suffering for momentary happiness, we must be willing to give up the experience of the swing, we must realize that in order to live we must get off the excitement of the swing and participate in life, as expressing ourselves, communicating with others, building intimate relationships and so on - all cannot occur when we are preoccupied with the energetic experience of being on a swing, we must allow ourselves to come off the swing, stop the energetic addiction, and start living here. One with the physical instead of consuming the physical for our pure self interest experience of momentary joy, to be followed by suffering inflicted on us or others.

We must realize and be aware of a few things here - Kinetic energy can only be positive due to it's mathematical expression having the velocity squared, and thus always positive, but, on the other hand, potential energy can be either positive or negative, it all depends on specific system's definitions, usually made out to be as convenient as possible for calculations, whereas this liberty of reference frames does not effect the physics of the situation - now, since we are working with a total energy that remains constant, we can define that constant as either a zero or a non zero number and it wouldn't effect the integrity of our investigation. So, just to be clear, in the case of the total energy being defined as zero, we must realize that the more kinetic energy we accumulate as a positive energy, the more negative potential energy we will have, this is direct consequence of the law of conservation of energy. In the other case, where we have defined the total energy as a non zero constant, we can define it in such a way that when the kinetic energy is at it's maximum, the potential energy will be zero, and then what we will have is altering fluctuations, as the kinetic energy increases the potential decreases - in other words, as the swing comes speeding down it's velocity increases, and thus it's kinetic energy grows, until it passes the center point where the velocity is maximal, at that point the swing is at it's lowest where the potential energy is defined as zero, then as the swing heads back up the velocity decreases until it comes to a stop and turns back down, where as the swing goes up, its' potential energy increases with it.

The energy of the swing will run out unless we have a constant force that puts more and more energy into the swing’s system, other wise it will gradually decrees in height and velocity, due to energy leaving the system in form of heat energy. in such a case there is a specific frequency in which the force must be aligned with in order to resonate with the natural frequency of the swing (this mostly depends on the length of the swing), if the force is emitted at the precise moment, the swing will accumulate energy, this is due to a phenomenon called "resonance" - where the force's frequency is in resonance, in alignment, with the frequency of the swing. What happens is, (and I'm sure you've all experienced this as kids on a swing, or pushing a kid on a swing), when the swing is pushed at the right moment, the push contributes to the velocity of the swing, thus giving it more kinetic energy, which must transform to more potential energy, and so, with every push the swing accumulates more energy, whereas, only due to physical limitations of the swing as friction and construct, will it not go higher and higher into infinity.

Why do I mention this point? First of all to explain the point of resonance, this doesn't happen only with swings, this accrues with everything that has a frequency - when two frequencies are aligned they resonate, and as they resonate the amplify, where the two frequencies must obviously be in the same form of substance for them to "communicate" with each other - what I mean by this is that you will not be able to swing your kid any higher by "pushing" the swing with electromagnetic frequency, you must make physical contact and push the swing using some form of mechanical force, same with any other form of wave / energy / frequency - a sound wave will not "communicate" with an electromagnetic waves, because they travel in different fields, they are different forms of substance.

Anyway, any two frequencies, of the same substance, could resonant with one another, whereas within the phenomena of resonance there is an amplification of the frequency - if both are "free" as in not restricted to their specific frequency by construct, you may see situations that both "meet in the middle" and unite at a third frequency, but if only one is restricted and the other is free to adjust it's frequency, as in the case of the swing, then one can align itself with the restricted frequency in order to resonate with it and amplify it - such with the person pushing the swing doing so deliberately, in awareness, at a specific frequency to enhance the energy of the swinging mass - in this case the free frequency is deliberately aligning itself with the restricted frequency, another case would be that the deliberate force is within a specific frequency, and using its' strength and stability to "bring" other frequencies to a desired frequency.

to be continued…..

Educate yourself further:

For very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"

To educate yourself on the energy of the mind as consciousness, "Kryon - My Existential History" explains how energy was used to program the mind

To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course

 

Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online

Also, Please check out the following Links:

Desteni

Desteni Wiki

Desteni Forum

Desteni I Process

Equal Money System

Journey to Life Group

Eqafe Life Products - Self Help

Creation's Journey to Life

Heaven's Journey to LIfe

Earth's Journey to Life

Day 15 - Conservation of Energy - Part 2

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”


In my previous blog I started investigating Energy. The first point that unexpectedly came up was that science doesn't really know what energy is, though what is known, or at least, believed to be known, is that "there is a certain quantity, which we call energy, that does not change in manifold changes which nature undergoes." (*The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol 1, Ch 4) this is referred to as the law of conservation of energy - this law simplistically states that "there is a numerical quantity which does not change when something happens. It is not a description of a mechanism, or anything concrete; it is just a strange fact that we can calculate some number and when we finish watching nature go through her tricks and calculate the number again, it is the same". (*The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol 1, Ch 4).

In other words, science has defined energy as a specific mathematical quantity that has specific dimensions / units, not knowing what energy is, not ever seeing it directly, but knowing that this quantity is constant - it doesn't change, no matter what happens. The law of conservation of energy states that energy may neither be created nor destroyed., therefore the sum of all the energies in the system is a constant.

Though considered a mystery, energy has been defined as the ability to do work, and thus, has the same units / dimensions as work - mechanical work is directly related to force, as it is defined as force that results in movement / displacements / change of the body it is working on, when force is omitted upon a body and results in movement / displacement / change of the body, the force is said to have done work. Thus, the units for work are the units for force (F) multiplied by the units of displacement (x) - as we know the units for force can be derived from the known equation F=ma, as Newton's second law of motion, and thus units of force will be the units of mass (kg) times the units of acceleration (m/s^2), thus the units for force are called Newtons .

Where work is defined as force that results in movement and thus is dimensionally equivalent newton-meter (N·m), though the SI unit of work is the joule (J), which is defined as the work done by a force of one newton acting over a distance of one meter. And thus, the units for energy, in SI units, are also joule (J).

As we already know, there are many forms of energy, thus, within conservation of energy, the quantity of energy can and will change it's form, and by calculating the sum of all the different forms of energies, within a closed system, at the beginning of an experiment, and then, at the end of the experiment, we will always find that it is equal, we will see that the sum of all forms of energy found within the closed system, will always remain constant. Where a closed system refers to a system that energy cannot flow in or out, and that all energies are accounted for and can be calculated.

I've been reading the Feynman Lectures on Physics - this book is based on the lectures given by Richard Feynman, let me share with you his way of explaining conservation of energy and the fact that energy in itself is unknown.

Imagine a child that has 28 play blocks, but these block are special because they are absolutely indestructible, and cannot be divided in to pieces - the child is playing in his room with his blocks, and at the end of each day, his mother comes in and counts how many blocks he has - she discovered an interesting phenomenal law - no matter what he does with his blocks through out the day, at the end of the day there are always 28 blocks.

This goes on for a while, until one day the mother, to her surprise, counts only 26 block - at first she panics as mothers tend to do, and then she investigates further and finds the missing blocks under the carpet.

Another day she comes in and counts only 25 blocks - she looks into it and realizes that the window of the room was open, and 3 blocks have fallen outside of the room, she then collects the fallen blocks and shuts the window. Some more days go by and as she goes by her daily routine she finds 30 block - how could this be?

She investigates and finds out that her son's friend cam over and forgot 3 of his blocks - she gets rid of the friend's forgotten blocks, and forbids of any friends with blocks to come over (this mother has become obsessed with these blocks, lol...). A few more days go by and as the mother counts the blocks she finds only 23 - the child then tells her that he had placed 5 blocks in his very privet box, in his room, and she mustn't open the box - though the obsessed mother has to find a way to count all blocks and make sure they are all accounted for, so one day, when there are 28 blocs visible and present, she takes note of the weight the box as well as an individual block, then the next day when blocks are missing she weighs the box and calculates how many blocks are in the box, through subtracting the current weights of the box with the original weight of the box, and dividing with the weight of one individual block - then she will add the amount of blocks that are hidden in the box, with the amount of blocks that are visibly seen, and will once again have the same constant number as before, 28.

This story goes on and one, where each time some blocks are missing, the mother finds a way to formulate the amount of the missing block - some blocks are in the bath, so she measures how high the water level is when the bath is empty and she measure how much the water rises as she places one block in the water, and formulates another term to her formula - the sum of the seen block, and all calculations of the missing blocks in all the different "hiding" places, always comes up to 28, always the same constant - each times she "loses" some blocks, she figures out another term to add to her equation and the result is time and time again constant. At a certain point she sees no more blocks because all are stored and hidden in different places and thus, she can only calculate how many blocks are in the room by measuring the slight displacements in the room that she had taken note of, and using her formulas to calculate how many blocks are in each place - at the end of the story we assume she had seen all the hidden places the blocks could be in.

So what do we have here, and how does this analogy reflect the conservation of energy? We have a mother, obsessed with her child's blocks, similar to how we as humanity are obsessed with energy, but this is not actually the point of this specific analogy, though I will address this at a later blog. At this stage she had not seen any block in a while, she knows they are there but cannot see them any more, she can only calculate how many blocks are in the room through the mathematical equations she had formulated, expressing the quantity of the blocks in each hidden location, where the sum of all formulas she came up with, is always constant - this story is an analogy to us not ever seeing the energy per say, but are only able to calculate it through the formulas given to each form of energy, where the sum of all energies will always be constant. Another point we must remember to consider, is whether the energy can enter or leave our defined system, where if that is the case - the law of conservation of energy will not hold, thus, in order to be able to apply the law of conservation of energy we must make sure this doesn't happen, that we are discussing a closed system, or define our system in such a way that it will include all energies.

In reality though, we know we lose lots of energy, there is a lot of discussion of how to "save energy", thinking of ways to preserve and conserve energy - so how does this coincide with the apparent conservation of energy? First of all, we mustn't forget that when speaking of conservation of energy it is referred to a "closed system" where energy cannot leave the system, where in reality we exist in one big closed system as the universe, though the localized systems are not closed, and thus there is a leakage of energy from within the system externally, mostly through thermal and radiation energy. We must remember that the physics model is a theoretical and ideal model whereas in life we don't have such ideal systems. Another point I found interesting is that the initial definition of energy is related to work, and thus, to the ability of the object / system to provide a desired change - when we refer to losing energy, we are actually referring to the loss of energy that can be used by us, humans, to be utilized to power our homes / industries / equipment - any process that involves energy does still stand within the law of conservation of energy per say, but the energy transforms to forms that cannot be "captured" by us, and thus we consider it as a loss.

I find it interesting that science gives so much "credit" to energy, and have defined it as a quantity that cannot be created nor destroyed, even though we know energy is "created" from substance, where physical substance is the chamber of all the chemical reactions, the nuclear partials, the movement to create friction and collisions, it's the physical substance that is involved in all interactions for us to have discovered and defined gravitational or electrical forces - it seems as if the research has been focusing on energy, and when discussing the physical and investigating it's elementary particles, it's does through the lens of energy, as energy, even though a mystery, and perhaps because of it's abstract formation, has become the essence, the goal, the source, everything, and the physical is seen as arbitrary - it's interesting because it's all in reverse, just as human behavior, where we consider energy to be greater than substance, we will trust our energetic experience as feelings and emotions more than the physical evidence that is right there plainly visible in front of us, we will interpret and assume within the illusions of our minds, instead of looking at reality directly as what is here, shown to us clearly and visibly as the physical.

We must always remember that all that we know about nature / science / reality is through our interpretation and within it our belief system, as the accepted paradigm we exist within - I find it interesting that there is a law of conservation of energy and not a law of conservation of physical substance, this reminds me of the point I made when I discussed the third law of motion, where science had made a decision to enhance one part of the equation and not the other even though they are equal within an equation - if we can equate substance to energy as the famous E=mc^2 we can very well equate energy to substance, as m=E/c^2 - this can always be a point of questioning, we can see the mentality of science within how formulas are expressed - as the energy is constructed by the other characters playing as stands in the play of energy, as energy is the main character. It's just an interesting point to investigate and question and consider what is the mentality, the mind's patterning behind it.

We know that energy can be created from / through substance, but can substance be created through / by energy? Science has given energy the highest regard, but it is actually an inferior expression to that of the physical as it is created by it and stored in it, but cannot "give back" the same regard to the physical - to create energy one must consume the physical substance in an irreversible way, irreversible from the perspective that we, as the human, cannot replenish that which we have destroyed in our thirst for energy, and even though the physical / nature itself can and does recreate itself within the circle and flow of life, it does it in a long and slow process, mush slower than the rate we consume it with our obsession to energy - it is much faster and easier to consume it than it is for the physical to reconstruct itself.

This blunt disregard for the physical within the scientific equations and understandings is a point where science failed to take responsibility, and has created an illusion for humanity to exist in, where we see energy as the goal to achieve, not considering the substance it consumes and destroys, and we do this effortlessly while the physical takes very long to recreate itself - it's fascinating, it's a point of consumerism, it's the same structure as consumerism, I find it fascinating to find the same construct playing out in such different arenas of life . A responsible science would not through such ideas without backing them up with presenting the consequences.

Have we even considered whether energy can recreate itself as substance dose? We have allowed ourselves to remain blind to the simple fact that energy is dependent on substance - we have connected /defined / seen energy as the source of life, but haven't considered that energy is created through the consumption and destruction of the physical, the very physical which allows this conversation, this sharing of ideas, to even take place - if we would have looked at the point, we would have most probably come to the conclusion that any type of energy cannot be a form of "life source" but rather the contrary, as a form of life consumer.
More on energy to come.

Recommendation for further self study:

For  very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"
 

 
To educate yourself on the energy of the mind as consciousness, "Kryon - My Existential History" explains how energy was used to program the mind
 



 
 
If you want to learn more about the topic of energy, here is a really well done lecture on "Work, Energy, and Universal Gravitation" given by Prof. Walter Lewin. You can find there all his lectures for the entire physics course.
 


 
and the book “The Feynman Lectures on Physics” is fascinating, where Richard Feynmen goes through the basic course of physics, and he dies so in such a unique and interesting way, his book is valuable for anyone that really wants to learn about physics in a profound way.



 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
 

 
Also, Please check out the following Links:

Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles

• Day 15 - Conservation of Energy - Part 2
• Day 14 - Energy Research - Part 1 - What is energy?
• Energy: another area of our lives that depends on council action
• Equal Energy Exchange

Day 14 – Energy Research – Part 1 - What is energy?

Energy is a term used very often these days - we hear of the word "energy" is many contexts, both physical and non physical - in this, and the following blogs, I will attempt to see the similarities, differences and connections between the different types and aspects of energy.

We will begin with physical energy - it is important to realize that scientists have no actual understanding of what energy is (Richard Feynman) - there are mathematical expressions that have been found, and defined as energy, though energy itself has never been directly observed, it can only be "seen" through the relationships and dependencies between other observable quantities.

As physicist attempt to understand the physical reality, they look for relationships between different natural quantities, and then defines those relationships as new quantities with specific characteristics, as for instance, the relationship between the quantity of displacement (x) as the distance a body travels, and the quantity of time (t) as the time a body is in motion, gives us "new" quantities such as velocity and acceleration, through specific mathematical equations that express the relationships and dependencies between the initial quantities.

It's interesting to question whether or not velocity, or any quantity for that matter, is independent of the equation scientists have found to define and calculate it by, does it exist independently as a physical relationship and interaction between quantities or is it's existence dependent on it being discovered by science? We must always consider the possibility that the definitions we have given a quantity may be limiting ones, and there might be "more" to the quantity in question - we must realize that in science, all we "see" is that which we see, only that which we have been able to define in a constructed equation - we must consider there is much more to reality than we have been able to equate mathematically - thus, even though it seems like we have gone through scientific exploration far and beyond our imaginations, we have a responsibility to always keep an "open mind" and practice critical investigation, as to not settle only with what has been found, but to further explore our existence, unconditionally, until we “find” ourselves within and as it –this within realizing that the laws of physics / nature / reality, govern all of existence, including ourselves, thus, the final answer / solution / equation / understanding will be one that gives us insight to the external reality and the internal reality, equally.

I bring this point up because in the topic of energy we will be going into our internal experience as energy, we will thus, investigate energy from a scientific perspective, as what has been found thus far, as what is "known" in regards to energy, as well as, we will bring up new points to consider, new perspective in regards to energy that have yet to be explored or understood fully. But all in due time.

Back to energy - The natural basic units in which energy is measured are those used for mechanical work; they always are equivalent to a unit of force multiplied by a unit of length (Wikipedia). As I've shown in the dimensional analysis blog I had written, a quantity is defined according to it's dimensions, thus, once a quantity, such as energy, is mathematically defined, it is recognized by specific dimensions as it's identity. Thus, any other formulation of relationships between other quantities, that have the same dimensions as the dimensions of the quantity at hand, are an expression of the same quantity -The quantity of energy, has many different expressions to it, derived from different fields of physics – they differ in some properties and characteristics, though, all expressions of energy have the same dimensions, and can ne converted and expressed as the unit of force multiplied by the unit of length, thus, whether electric, thermal, nuclear, or magnetic energy, their units will be equivalent to the basic unit of energy, known also as mechanical work. Any new relationship found, that will provide a quantity with the same dimensions as that of energy, will be defined as energy as well.

Here, is a hyperlinked list of different forms / expressions of energy within the different fields of physics, for you to explore for yourself - each form is represented with a different mathematical equation / formula, but all can be converted in such a way that they will be expressed by the same units of energy, as mentioned above:

• Thermal energy

• Chemical energy

• Electric energy

• Radiant energy, the energy of electromagnetic radiation

• Nuclear energy

• Magnetic energy

• Elastic energy

• Sound energy

• Mechanical energy

• Luminous energy

• Mass (E=mc²)

The different forms of energy are generally divided into two main categories: Kinetic Energy, where the energy is a function of the movement of an object or it's particles, and Potential Energy, where the energy is a function of the position of an object within a field. thus, the energy of an object / particle is calculated through it’s observed movement as velocity, and/or it’s observed positions in relation to the field it is in – When we discuss the conservation of energy, we will see that an object’s total energy remains constant though the ration between kinetic to potential energy changes, as the expression of the object’s energy changes back and forth from kinetic to potential energy, this within assuming an ideal and closed system.

In the beginning of this blog I had made a statement that we will be looking at physical energy and non physical energy, this will be clarified further in blogs to come - I find these terms might be a bit confusing, because all physical energy can be seen as non physical as it is not substance per say, but rather a field or a property that effects substance or is held within it - a glimpse of Einstein's famous equation E=mc² , which some of you may be familiar with, sheds some light on this point, as it expresses the link between physical substance as mass, and energy, in other words it shows us that physical substance and energy are actually equal and theoretically interchangeable, though practically speaking they are interchangeable only to some degree. So, we see through Einstein's energy equation that even though energy is not substance per say, it is equal to substance, thus, within this blog series, we will call this energy “physical energy”, whereas non physical energy will be referring to the “mind’s energy”, the energy of the mind as thoughts, emotions and feelings. This field of non physical mind energy is what I'll be exploring, and attempting to connect / relate to the field of energy known and explored by physicist, I will attempt to gain further clarity and understanding of both physical energy and mind energy - within the assumption that all energies follow the same rules, have similar properties to some extent, and exist within / as the same dimensions - thus, understanding the one can give insight into understanding the other.

In the following blogs I will investigate the properties of energy, the energy conservation law, where as the more we know about energy from what has been found scientifically, we will be able to apply this knowledge upon our research of the energy within ourselves as the mind's energy, which will be discussed and investigated further as I proceed with the blogs, and the more we understand the mind's energy we might find new approaches to explore and better understand the physical energy - who knows what lays ahead, so stay tuned.
 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course

Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
 
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles

• Day 14 - Energy Research - Part 1 - What is energy?
• Day 15 - Conservation of Energy - Part 2
• Differences Between Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy
• Day 10 - Fundamentals of Physics - 1.4 - Dimensional Analysis
• Equal Energy Exchange

Day 13 - Fundamentals of Physics - 1.7 - Significant Figures

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “Fundamentals of Physics”

When speaking about significant figures we are entering to and exposing the world of uncertainty within science. When making measurements, there is always going to be a level of uncertainty, as a degree of error. As appose to counting objects where everyone would count the same number, when making a measurement there is no such thing as an EXACT measurement - thus, when making measurements we do so to an accepted level of accuracy / precision. The level of precision is limited by the measuring tools and equipment as well as human error, and in some cases precession is compromised based on practical decisions made in consideration of the specific measurement, where there could have been a more accurate and precise measurement by using technology that can provide such accuracy, but it was unnecessary for the specific experiment / project. Once the level of accuracy is accepted, experiment can be held many times in order to decrease the level of error, using statistical measures.

"Significant figure" is related to the value received by the measurement, and specifically refers to the digits, within the measured value, that are certain and the first uncertain digit as well, in other words - a digit is said to be a significant figure if it is either known with certainty or if it is the first estimated digit in a measurement.

Let me explain with a simple example, when measuring the length of you desk, you may use a measuring tape as a practical tool to do so, you will notice that your measuring take is marked by line and numbers, indicating the length in which ever unit you measuring tape is aligned with. If it is a metric measuring tape you will a lines marked 1 centimeters apart with a number to indicate how many centimeters you are measuring, though it's not all, you will see that each centimeter is divided to 10 smaller parts, called millimeters, and are marked by 9 small lines -this is as far as the division goes, which means that you are limited in regards to the level of precision you are able to reach within measuring your desk, you cannot measure it in accuracy greater than the level of millimeters, which implies that the millimeter is your limit of certainty, thus, the first digit of uncertainty.

Putting what we have here all together, if you measured your desk to be 75.5cm long, due to the uncertainty you should write it as (75.5 +/- 0.1)cm, indicating that your level of uncertainty was limited at the scale of millimeter (0.1 cm), this maintains the integrity of you measurements as it incorporates it's level of certainty, you can then say that your measurement has 3 significant figures - 2 of which are certain (there is a certainty about the measuring of 75 cm) and 1 of which is uncertain as the actual exact length of the table could be anywhere between 75.4 cm and 75.6 cm.

if I'm using a measuring tape that is divided to millimeters, I am limited within my measurement as I cannot measure anything smaller than a millimeter , thus, the accuracy I can reach will be +/- 1mm, in other words, which ever value I measure it can be more or less 1 millimeter. And so I must add this range of error into the result if I want to express the precision I had throughout my experiment.

When expressing the value of your measurement the amount of significant figures should be the same no matter which unites you chose to express it by, you could write it out as 0.754m, or 75.4cm, and as you can see in both cases you have 3 significant figure. But, zeros can be tricky within this, have a look, if you would have found that the desk's length is 100cm,but due to the absence of a decimal point the amount of significant figures is vague, you can only guess if the level of certainty was in the scale of millimeters or centimeters, it is left unclear. You could also express the length of your desk as 1m, though you see that in such writing you only have one significant figure, yet you have used the same measuring tape, and thus, you should express the same level of certainty within your answer, thus, within respecting this point, it has been agreed to write it as such 1.00m where the additional zeros are there as significant figures.

This bring me to the point of scientific notation, where it has been agreed that when expressing values in any units you may chose you will write it out in such a way that the number is expressed as a number between 1 - 10 times an exponent of 10, so if you want to express 100cm with a level of certainty of 1mm, you will write it as 1.000*10^2, this way you maintain the zeros in the relevant spaces to express the level of certainty, as the significant figures and thus maintain the integrity of the measurement. The scientific notation is also good for when speaking of really large or extremely small values, where it makes it easier to clearly see the power of magnitude of the value as they are all standardized to being a number between 1 and 10, times the specific power of 10.

I will not go into the specific details of this point in regards to making calculations and maintaining the level of uncertainty as there are a few mathematical laws you must be aware of, though, the principle is that by the end of the calculation you must have a figure that expresses the level of precision within your measurement. I will place below the links I have used to gather the info for this blog, you can check it out if you want to know more.
So there we have it, significant figures as indication of level of certainty, and scientific notation as a standard way of expressing values that allow clear and easy access to plainly see the significant figures, direct calculation and are easily comparable.

What I found surprising while investigating this point in preparation for writing my blog, is that the significant figures includes not only the digits of certainty, but the first digit of uncertainty as well - I would have expected that the significant figures would represent only that which science is certain of, but I was wrong, and it's actually a cool point to consider, because it implies that the uncertainty is as significant as the certainty.

Within our process we find ourselves facing a lot of uncertainty, yet we tend to want to walk only in the known paths, were we experience ourselves as certain, where we don't have to face the "dangers" of the unknown, though it is within the levels of uncertainty where we can expand in and actually find the "missing pieces" of ourselves, the pieces we have suppressed to such an extent that they are unknown to us.

We must realize that, just as science improves it's technologies to be able to reach higher levels of precision, so can we -whenever we reach a "dead end" in our self investigation we must know that we can go deeper and reach higher levels of precision and specificity through asking ourselves questions, and allowing ourselves to self honestly open ourselves up to ourselves in self intimacy, to reveal ourselves to ourselves. Though the ability / skill to go deeper and reach the specifics of ourselves, goes hand in hand with the will and dedication to actually investigate those hidden areas within ourselves, areas we have kept in the dark from ourselves due to self judgment and shame - thus, through the process of self forgiveness we allow ourselves to release ourselves from the self judgment and shame and allow ourselves to face the points as they are, as we accepted and allowed them to exist within us and to direct us throughout our lives.

Another point this brings up within me, that I find interesting, is that, generally speaking, the word "significant" implies something large and important, where as we see that it actually refers to the small and large values, equally. This is to remind us that we exist both in the large scale as the general constructs or patterns we exist as, and the smallest of the details as they are the building blocks we have built the constructs / patterns of ourselves with - for me, I have been resisting for a long time to face myself within the specifics, as I wanted to only look at the larger scale and only investigate the general pattern, but that is self manipulation, because even though I exist as a general pattern, this character / pattern I have created myself as was built and designed through the accumulation of many small in seemingly insignificant memories / events / interpretations / experiences, and thus, when investigating myself within any pattern, I must walk through the resistance of looking at all the details and allow myself to face myself within them, because as they say "god is in the details"- we exist in the details of ourselves, and thus, in order to walk a process of self correction we must investigate the most seemingly insignificant and minute points, within realizing that they are in fact equally significant as the large scaled patterns. Further more, not only are they significant due to being the building blocks of how we created ourselves as who we are as the patterns and constructs we exist as, they are actually the key to the next layer of specificity - as we improve our level of precision by walking step by step through the levels and layers of ourselves, having to walk passed all the layers along the way.

There are no short cuts. Thus, every dead end we reach we will initially resist, though we must then find it within ourselves to walk through the resistance and investigate the specific details of this new and unknown realm of ourselves, we have entered into, to then expose the next level of precision as we come closer and closer to ourselves in oneness and equality.


Links I've used, for reference:
http://physics.about.com/od/classroomphysics/a/SigFigs.htm
http://www.pipeline.com/~merlin/signif.htm
http://dev.physicslab.org/Document.aspx?doctype=3&filename=IntroductoryMathematics_SignificantFigures.xml

 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
 
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles

• Day 13 - Fundamentals of Physics - 1.7 - Significant Figures
• Day 12 - Fundamentals of Physics - 1.6 Estimations and Order of Magnitude
• Measurement of Uncertainty
• Accuracy, precision, and significance: The misery of cholera [Significant Figures]