Day 15 - Conservation of Energy - Part 2

You are welcome to check out my previous blogs within the series “What is Energy”


In my previous blog I started investigating Energy. The first point that unexpectedly came up was that science doesn't really know what energy is, though what is known, or at least, believed to be known, is that "there is a certain quantity, which we call energy, that does not change in manifold changes which nature undergoes." (*The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol 1, Ch 4) this is referred to as the law of conservation of energy - this law simplistically states that "there is a numerical quantity which does not change when something happens. It is not a description of a mechanism, or anything concrete; it is just a strange fact that we can calculate some number and when we finish watching nature go through her tricks and calculate the number again, it is the same". (*The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol 1, Ch 4).

In other words, science has defined energy as a specific mathematical quantity that has specific dimensions / units, not knowing what energy is, not ever seeing it directly, but knowing that this quantity is constant - it doesn't change, no matter what happens. The law of conservation of energy states that energy may neither be created nor destroyed., therefore the sum of all the energies in the system is a constant.

Though considered a mystery, energy has been defined as the ability to do work, and thus, has the same units / dimensions as work - mechanical work is directly related to force, as it is defined as force that results in movement / displacements / change of the body it is working on, when force is omitted upon a body and results in movement / displacement / change of the body, the force is said to have done work. Thus, the units for work are the units for force (F) multiplied by the units of displacement (x) - as we know the units for force can be derived from the known equation F=ma, as Newton's second law of motion, and thus units of force will be the units of mass (kg) times the units of acceleration (m/s^2), thus the units for force are called Newtons .

Where work is defined as force that results in movement and thus is dimensionally equivalent newton-meter (N·m), though the SI unit of work is the joule (J), which is defined as the work done by a force of one newton acting over a distance of one meter. And thus, the units for energy, in SI units, are also joule (J).

As we already know, there are many forms of energy, thus, within conservation of energy, the quantity of energy can and will change it's form, and by calculating the sum of all the different forms of energies, within a closed system, at the beginning of an experiment, and then, at the end of the experiment, we will always find that it is equal, we will see that the sum of all forms of energy found within the closed system, will always remain constant. Where a closed system refers to a system that energy cannot flow in or out, and that all energies are accounted for and can be calculated.

I've been reading the Feynman Lectures on Physics - this book is based on the lectures given by Richard Feynman, let me share with you his way of explaining conservation of energy and the fact that energy in itself is unknown.

Imagine a child that has 28 play blocks, but these block are special because they are absolutely indestructible, and cannot be divided in to pieces - the child is playing in his room with his blocks, and at the end of each day, his mother comes in and counts how many blocks he has - she discovered an interesting phenomenal law - no matter what he does with his blocks through out the day, at the end of the day there are always 28 blocks.

This goes on for a while, until one day the mother, to her surprise, counts only 26 block - at first she panics as mothers tend to do, and then she investigates further and finds the missing blocks under the carpet.

Another day she comes in and counts only 25 blocks - she looks into it and realizes that the window of the room was open, and 3 blocks have fallen outside of the room, she then collects the fallen blocks and shuts the window. Some more days go by and as she goes by her daily routine she finds 30 block - how could this be?

She investigates and finds out that her son's friend cam over and forgot 3 of his blocks - she gets rid of the friend's forgotten blocks, and forbids of any friends with blocks to come over (this mother has become obsessed with these blocks, lol...). A few more days go by and as the mother counts the blocks she finds only 23 - the child then tells her that he had placed 5 blocks in his very privet box, in his room, and she mustn't open the box - though the obsessed mother has to find a way to count all blocks and make sure they are all accounted for, so one day, when there are 28 blocs visible and present, she takes note of the weight the box as well as an individual block, then the next day when blocks are missing she weighs the box and calculates how many blocks are in the box, through subtracting the current weights of the box with the original weight of the box, and dividing with the weight of one individual block - then she will add the amount of blocks that are hidden in the box, with the amount of blocks that are visibly seen, and will once again have the same constant number as before, 28.

This story goes on and one, where each time some blocks are missing, the mother finds a way to formulate the amount of the missing block - some blocks are in the bath, so she measures how high the water level is when the bath is empty and she measure how much the water rises as she places one block in the water, and formulates another term to her formula - the sum of the seen block, and all calculations of the missing blocks in all the different "hiding" places, always comes up to 28, always the same constant - each times she "loses" some blocks, she figures out another term to add to her equation and the result is time and time again constant. At a certain point she sees no more blocks because all are stored and hidden in different places and thus, she can only calculate how many blocks are in the room by measuring the slight displacements in the room that she had taken note of, and using her formulas to calculate how many blocks are in each place - at the end of the story we assume she had seen all the hidden places the blocks could be in.

So what do we have here, and how does this analogy reflect the conservation of energy? We have a mother, obsessed with her child's blocks, similar to how we as humanity are obsessed with energy, but this is not actually the point of this specific analogy, though I will address this at a later blog. At this stage she had not seen any block in a while, she knows they are there but cannot see them any more, she can only calculate how many blocks are in the room through the mathematical equations she had formulated, expressing the quantity of the blocks in each hidden location, where the sum of all formulas she came up with, is always constant - this story is an analogy to us not ever seeing the energy per say, but are only able to calculate it through the formulas given to each form of energy, where the sum of all energies will always be constant. Another point we must remember to consider, is whether the energy can enter or leave our defined system, where if that is the case - the law of conservation of energy will not hold, thus, in order to be able to apply the law of conservation of energy we must make sure this doesn't happen, that we are discussing a closed system, or define our system in such a way that it will include all energies.

In reality though, we know we lose lots of energy, there is a lot of discussion of how to "save energy", thinking of ways to preserve and conserve energy - so how does this coincide with the apparent conservation of energy? First of all, we mustn't forget that when speaking of conservation of energy it is referred to a "closed system" where energy cannot leave the system, where in reality we exist in one big closed system as the universe, though the localized systems are not closed, and thus there is a leakage of energy from within the system externally, mostly through thermal and radiation energy. We must remember that the physics model is a theoretical and ideal model whereas in life we don't have such ideal systems. Another point I found interesting is that the initial definition of energy is related to work, and thus, to the ability of the object / system to provide a desired change - when we refer to losing energy, we are actually referring to the loss of energy that can be used by us, humans, to be utilized to power our homes / industries / equipment - any process that involves energy does still stand within the law of conservation of energy per say, but the energy transforms to forms that cannot be "captured" by us, and thus we consider it as a loss.

I find it interesting that science gives so much "credit" to energy, and have defined it as a quantity that cannot be created nor destroyed, even though we know energy is "created" from substance, where physical substance is the chamber of all the chemical reactions, the nuclear partials, the movement to create friction and collisions, it's the physical substance that is involved in all interactions for us to have discovered and defined gravitational or electrical forces - it seems as if the research has been focusing on energy, and when discussing the physical and investigating it's elementary particles, it's does through the lens of energy, as energy, even though a mystery, and perhaps because of it's abstract formation, has become the essence, the goal, the source, everything, and the physical is seen as arbitrary - it's interesting because it's all in reverse, just as human behavior, where we consider energy to be greater than substance, we will trust our energetic experience as feelings and emotions more than the physical evidence that is right there plainly visible in front of us, we will interpret and assume within the illusions of our minds, instead of looking at reality directly as what is here, shown to us clearly and visibly as the physical.

We must always remember that all that we know about nature / science / reality is through our interpretation and within it our belief system, as the accepted paradigm we exist within - I find it interesting that there is a law of conservation of energy and not a law of conservation of physical substance, this reminds me of the point I made when I discussed the third law of motion, where science had made a decision to enhance one part of the equation and not the other even though they are equal within an equation - if we can equate substance to energy as the famous E=mc^2 we can very well equate energy to substance, as m=E/c^2 - this can always be a point of questioning, we can see the mentality of science within how formulas are expressed - as the energy is constructed by the other characters playing as stands in the play of energy, as energy is the main character. It's just an interesting point to investigate and question and consider what is the mentality, the mind's patterning behind it.

We know that energy can be created from / through substance, but can substance be created through / by energy? Science has given energy the highest regard, but it is actually an inferior expression to that of the physical as it is created by it and stored in it, but cannot "give back" the same regard to the physical - to create energy one must consume the physical substance in an irreversible way, irreversible from the perspective that we, as the human, cannot replenish that which we have destroyed in our thirst for energy, and even though the physical / nature itself can and does recreate itself within the circle and flow of life, it does it in a long and slow process, mush slower than the rate we consume it with our obsession to energy - it is much faster and easier to consume it than it is for the physical to reconstruct itself.

This blunt disregard for the physical within the scientific equations and understandings is a point where science failed to take responsibility, and has created an illusion for humanity to exist in, where we see energy as the goal to achieve, not considering the substance it consumes and destroys, and we do this effortlessly while the physical takes very long to recreate itself - it's fascinating, it's a point of consumerism, it's the same structure as consumerism, I find it fascinating to find the same construct playing out in such different arenas of life . A responsible science would not through such ideas without backing them up with presenting the consequences.

Have we even considered whether energy can recreate itself as substance dose? We have allowed ourselves to remain blind to the simple fact that energy is dependent on substance - we have connected /defined / seen energy as the source of life, but haven't considered that energy is created through the consumption and destruction of the physical, the very physical which allows this conversation, this sharing of ideas, to even take place - if we would have looked at the point, we would have most probably come to the conclusion that any type of energy cannot be a form of "life source" but rather the contrary, as a form of life consumer.
More on energy to come.

Recommendation for further self study:

For  very basics, and investigate the creation of it all, before substance and energy were manifested, and how they came about, how awareness as the initial creator, had brought us to the point where we are at, in the physical, enslaved to the separation within/as energy - you must invest in this series "The Secret History of the Universe"
 

 
To educate yourself on the energy of the mind as consciousness, "Kryon - My Existential History" explains how energy was used to program the mind
 



 
 
If you want to learn more about the topic of energy, here is a really well done lecture on "Work, Energy, and Universal Gravitation" given by Prof. Walter Lewin. You can find there all his lectures for the entire physics course.
 


 
and the book “The Feynman Lectures on Physics” is fascinating, where Richard Feynmen goes through the basic course of physics, and he dies so in such a unique and interesting way, his book is valuable for anyone that really wants to learn about physics in a profound way.



 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
 

 
Also, Please check out the following Links:

Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles

• Day 15 - Conservation of Energy - Part 2
• Day 14 - Energy Research - Part 1 - What is energy?
• Energy: another area of our lives that depends on council action
• Equal Energy Exchange

Day 6 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion - Forces

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”

Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction

Day 2 - Physics and the Desteni Process – Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia

Day 3 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Third Law of Motion - Equal Force

Day 4 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion

Day 5 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Scientific Paradigm

I have been discussing forces in the past few blogs, and I realized that I haven't yet defined what is force sufficiently. a force is some form of an influence, as impact within the interaction of two or more masses that causes any form of change to take place - though a force can be emitted without any apparent change taking place and that would mean that the force wasn't effective, maybe not strong enough to over come inertia or other forces in play, or was not pushing in the "right" direction - Newton's definition of force is that which causes a mass to create a specific change as acceleration - this definition relates to another concept in physics - "work", where a force is said to be doing "work" when it results in the movement of the mass in the direction of the force, in a way, work is defined through the "success" of the force to "do it's job" as to influence the mass within movement (I will expand more on work in a separate blog to come) - so what is force?
 
As I see it, regardless the outcome of the interaction, in any interaction, in any point of contact, in any form of communication - exists force. I've been trying to look at it from the perspective of cause and effect, but due to all masses being subject to forces, and all forces being subject to other external forces, I found myself lost in infinity - as I was investigating the point I came to realize that the force is both the cause and the effect, the starting point and the consequence, of every interaction and every relationship, which is actually everything - because everything exists within relationships and interactions - any interaction would be caused by a force, and will result in a force, so reality is swirling from a force to an interaction, to a force to an interaction into infinity.
 
To make what I'm saying more clear, imagine a time-line shaped like a spring as the image, now imagine that every loop in the spring is isolated, so it would now look like we have many isolated rings - this is what we do in physics as we define a "closed system", as if it is in a way separated from the rest of existence, and investigate it as an isolated system, as an isolated ring, we isolate the experiment to any external forces, or take into consideration some external forces such as gravity and include it to the system, but we do this within the assumption that systems can be isolated - this is another hidden assumption made by the scientific community, that I for one have never really questioned before, but if you look at it, it cannot be taken for granted that systems can be isolated, because everything in existence is inter-connected, so any attempt to isolate a system is already distancing itself from the actuality of that which is here, as all in existence interact with everything else, thus nothing can really be isolated.
 
In each isolated ring the scientists can cause a force as a cause and then investigate it's effect on the isolated/closed system and masses within it. But when we re-connect the rings to return to their initial form of a spring we will see what I have stated above – Have a look, you can start with placing a force at any point on the spring, the force through interaction will effect the mass into acceleration, or will influence it in some form, and as the result of the interaction, at the end of the loop, we will have another force, that then begins a new loop, and so on and so forth.
 
To explain the point further let's go back to Newton's second law of motion F=ma – I will give an example, within this example I will define the mass, the force and the acceleration specifically. Which brings up another point to consider, in which physics had defined mass as basically passive and a very simplistic and constant property, here I will open up further the definition of mass within considering more properties it might have.
 
Lets have a look at mass media, as a form of interaction that comes from one source and reaches the masses (have you ever noticed that many people are called masses? An interesting use of words) - the media is exerting force onto us as it influences us through our interaction with it, lets' investigate the equation - the mass would be the information, the acceleration is the application of this information by the media as new articles or any platform the media uses to move its' mass, and thus accelerate the information, in turn it creates a force as we are influenced by it to believe certain things, to go out and protest, to feel in a certain way, and you can consider the accumulated amount of force the media is exerting in order to influence so many points of mass, as the masses - through our interaction with the media we are forced, not by our directive principle, to move, we don't know why or how the force of the media influenced us, yet we are influenced, and then as we take our interpretation of the information, and make it into another point of mass, and accelerate it through our application - if we read something that we interpret as offensive we will write a comment to the editor, or if we saw a sale on a product we like, we will buy it on the next run to the mall, or even initiate an un planed run to the mall - we were influenced by the force created by our interaction with the media, to create a mass of our own as interpretation which now hold an energetic experience to it that we didn't ask for, thus we didn't direct it as ourselves - we were forced into it, and we act on it as we accelerate it within our application and give it motion, thus, through this we create a force as the outflow of our actions, as the influence our actions will have on reality.
 
In this example I walked through two connected rings - the media as a force exerted on the masses, influences the masses through acceleration it's own mass as information, and then as a result, we create a point of mass as our interpretation and reaction to the forces exerted upon us by the media, and accelerate the mass through our actions which creates another point of interaction and thus force and so on - in order to investigate the entire spring and not just look at the isolated rings, we must investigate what are the forces that were exerted on the media to set it's mass into action, and then go back to the forces that were exerted on those forces and so on…
 
Information is one property of mass, another property would be for instance memories, as we accumulate memories as mass and then as we apply these memories into action we create a force. A simple every day example exists in all our relationships, as we hold on to memories of scenarios that happened in the past within our relationship to another, we put the memory into acceleration when we tap into it and direct ourselves according to it – if i have a memory of my boyfriend cheating on me, every time i will tap into that memory i will feel betrayed and act on my feelings, thus accelerate the memory through my application.
 
Through the spring analogy it's actually interesting to see that as we live our lives accumulating memories and putting them into action as acceleration, the force we are exerting will be equal to the starting point - and thus we create the same experiences over and over and thus accumulate more of the same memories to justify to ourselves that we were right to believe and hold on to that memory as saying to ourselves "here, it happened again", not realizing that through holding on to the memory as the mass of ourselves, we accelerate the memories through applying them, participating with them, and believing them to be valid and true, and thus we create a force that is equal to them, and thus repeat the experience over and over.
 
An interesting point within the law of equality, as the natural law, is that the outcome will always reflect the starting point, and since we are walking our existence on an endless spring, we are, in every moment, living the consequences of the forces that were exerted upon us, and we as a result continue with the same line of force. What this means is that we don't really have to go back in time and actually know all the details of the forces that were in play for us to have reached this point, because the spring will keep repeating itself - it would thus be sufficient to investigate all that is here at this moment, within self honesty, in order to come to the conclusion of the "type" of forces that were in play, through investigating what exists within and as our reality we can conclude the "type" forces exerted over and over – were these forces aligned with the natural force, the law of balance that allows life to exist, or where they aligned with the forces of self interest as the forces that disregard life as all that is here.
 
We have been looking at the force as the starting point, as the source. I suggest investigating the possibility that the force exerted will be dependent of the property of the mass - I have defined the mass thus far as energy, information and memory - mass from this perspective is any form of substance, a substance can be an idea, a belief, a memory, knowledge, an energetic reaction, anything we hold onto as "emotional baggage" - while the property of the mass indicated who we are, as what we are equal to and one with through our participation - we can conclude that if we believe we are applying ourselves as mass into acceleration and do not have an impact or do not influence reality in the way we intended - we must revisit our starting point within investigating the property of ourselves as the mass, as our force is proven to be ineffective - at this point we can push harder and harder but without considering what it is that we are pushing, as the mass, as who we are, we might never resolve the problem and reach the desired solution. If the force that we are exerting is causing conflict and friction in our world and our reality, we must consider that the property of our mass, as who we are, is not aligned with the forces of nature, and thus we must change ourselves to become one with nature as all that is here, to correct our mass to have the properties of life, as the properties of equality, and within such properties we will be aligned with the forces of balance, as the force of nature, and will thus apply ourselves as acceleration into a direction that is best for all life.
 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles

• Day 246: Physics and God - ADC - Part 93
• 246. Why do we Seek to Escape this World through Emotions?
• The Correction Process and The Desteni Message (Part 8) - Day 205
• From Reaction to Prevention and the Correction Process (Part 3) - Day 241
• Day 117 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction

Day 4 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”
Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction
Day 2 - Physics and the Desteni Process – Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia
Day 3 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Third Law of Motion - Equal Force

In my previous blog I discussed the point of forces within an interaction of two or more objects, the point of equal forces that has been discussed remain true for every relationship and within every interaction, but as I've mentioned in my previous blog, the scientific community has agreed to discuss the forces being emitted upon an object when discussing it's motion and not the forces it is emitting and thus responsible for, initially I thought I could align myself with the scientific agreement, but as I go into the depth of the points I see more and more how deceptive and misleading the scientific perspective is, and thus I will show the physics part through the eyes of the mainstream physics, and for the sake of my arguments I will show the interactions from the point of view of the mass, as the forces the mass is emitting and thus responsible for.
 
Still looking at forces, today I will investigate Newton's second law of motion - out of the three, this is the most discussed law when it come to the schooling system, as it shows the relationship between force and change in motion as acceleration, it follows the first law that discusses the resistance to change -Newton's second law completes it with explaining what is necessary for change in motion to take place, thus force.
 
Let's have a look at how forces come into this equation, as we know and see all around us that things do move around and change their velocity despite their inherent force of inertia which is the resistance to change, same as we know that we have changed within ourselves through out our lives despite the resistance to change, so let's figure out how this change happens, and what is this force.
 
the second law of motion exhibits the relationship between force and the change in momentum, which is the change in velocity and mass of an object over time - within motion, for an object to change it's velocity, whether direction or speed, a force must be acting upon it, Newton discovered that the force necessary to change an objects velocity is equal to the change of the body's momentum in time.
 
Momentum (p) is a property of a body that has a mass (m) and is moving in a velocity (v) - thus p=mv
 
Just a small mathematical explanation before I continue regarding derivatives that are soon to come - a derivative will look something like this: d@/dt, but instead of the @ figure there would be a parameter that is dependent in time and thus changes in time. a familiar derivative you can probably all relate to is velocity, as we know it refers to miles per hour, or generally speaking, it expresses the distance a body will move in a chosen time frame, thus the displacement of a body, the change in the body's location, so velocity will look like this v=dx/dt
Where: v=velocity, x=displacement , t=time
 
Now that we got this cleared up I can continue
 
Newton found that the force needed to change a body's velocity is defined as the derivative of it's momentum, thus force is defined as the change in momentum through time, mathematically it looks like follows: F = dp/dt which means, how much momentum a body will gain or lose in a chosen time frame.
 
Any quantity that changes in time, is dependent on time and thus can be derived through time, in many cases the mass is constant through time, and in such cases their derivative in time will be zero because they don't change in time - they are constant, in such cases where the mass is constant through time only the velocity part of the momentum will be derived through time, and thus the force will appear as follows:

F = dp/dt = m(dv/dt) = ma

 
where a stand for acceleration, and is defined by the derivative of velocity in time, which in essence means that acceleration reflects how much will the object's velocity increase or decrease in a chosen time frame. All this brings us to the formulation of the second law of motion as most are familiar with: F=ma
 
A force acting on a body will cause it to accelerate depending on it's mass, where the more mass a body has the more force must be emitted to reach the same acceleration.
 
One can see that this law goes along with Newton's first law, where there is no acceleration taking place the net force will be zero, and when the net force exerted on a body is zero the body will not accelerate, remain in it's constant velocity, as indicate the principle of inertia
 
it's easy to relate to this point when driving a car, I'm sure you've noticed that if you are at a stop light next to a big heavy truck when the light will turn green you will accelerate much faster, this is not because you have a more powerful engine, it's because the mass of your car in relation to the truck is less - so one must realize that the mass of an object will influence it's ability to accelerate, and thus how much force will be needed to reach a specific acceleration - the larger the mass of an object, the harder it will be for it to accelerate, but we know this already based on the principle of inertia.
 
So, how does Newton's second law of physics relate to the Desteni Process?
 
Newton law states that a force emitted on an object with a mass will cause it to accelerate - I have to go back to the third law of physics, and insist on the misunderstanding and misleading perspective within interpreting the situation as such where the mass is passive and the force emitted upon it is the cause and source of it's acceleration, I insist because the mass could equally be seen as the source of movement due to it's participation and exertion of forces as we've seen within Newton's third law - consider the simple fact that the mass is the one that is moving, acting and interacting.
 
The idea that mass is a passive object creates a paradox that can be solved either through the acceptance of a god almighty or some other external mystery force that is the sole director of this reality, or by accepting the idea that the mass is it's own directive principle and that everything in reality is self responsible and if all that exists would realize self as self responsible, within self honesty, it would not believe itself to be submitted to forces, but would direct the forces that it is participating within anyway, yet at the moment not aware of it and thus not existing as the directive principle of it's own forces of which it is participating with in every interaction.
 
If we insist to believe that mass is passive, because it sounds "too crazy" to believe mass has any responsibility, then we must ask ourselves: is the force that is emitted on the mass, is it responsible? But it is also just another mass so it can't be responsible and is only reacting to other external forces… which if I continue this line of logic the external force would have to be passive as well, so we can go on and on and will never find the source of the motion, the source of the force, because everything is seen as subject to external forces - continuing with line of logic we would come to the conclusion that everything is passively reacting to forces emitted upon it which are passive to other forces, so who or what is directing reality as we see there is a sense of law and order.
 
Some people may believe that humans are the only beings with awareness and thus the ability to direct - but that would make us into the only self directed force, and that doesn't make sense because everything existed way before humanity did.
 
As far as I see it there are three options, 1) there is a god that is directing everything, and making us do the scientific experiments that we do, and is in fact the directive principle and the sole responsible for all that is here - I see this as a great way to bale out of taking responsibility, or 2) only humans have awareness and thus the ability to direct, that would contradict the fact that everything existed before humanity, and would also raise the obvious question of if this is true, then why is humanity only destroying everything around it like a living cancer in a body it doesn't realize it is killing, or 3) everything has awareness, equally, but we have all abdicated our responsibility of ourselves and of reality as existence as a whole, thus we must self realize, we must find ourselves within ourselves within the physical as the physical - this is in essence the Desteni Process, a process of self empowerment so that we can be more than who we have accepted ourselves to be as enslaved to mysterious forces that are directing us, but rather investigate ourselves within the starting point of self honesty and realize that we are ourselves, and thus can realize ourselves as who we are, what we do, why we do it, so that within realizing this, we can become self aware and equalize ourselves to the forces that are as of yet exerted on us, and direct them as our own force, then all in existence can do the same equally, because we are all connected within the interactions that we exist in.
 
The fact that everyone is passively accepting the forces emitted upon them is true but notice the words I used, passively accepting the forces - not passive to the forces. This indicates an ability of choice, a choice that might be denied and overlooked, but still exists. So we are allowing forces to direct us as implied by the second law of motions, but we must ask ourselves and investigate within self honesty if we have the ability to change within ourselves, and reconnect to our inner force which is the realization that we are equal to and one with everything that is here and thus not inherently submitted to any force, but have a choice, because we, as humanity, as mass, as substance, can in fact become the directive principle, we just haven't realized it yet.
 
So, now, back to the second law of motion, and lets see if we can interpret it in a way that supports us to understand the reality in which we live in and the forces at hand and how we can impact and effect ourselves and reality.
 
Looking at the equation F=ma from the perspective of a mass, it is no longer seen as if the force is emitted on the mass and causing the acceleration, but utilizing Newton's third law of motion, we can look at it as the mass is responsible for the force it is emitting and thus is putting itself into action, accelerating itself through application, and through that accumulates force which it emits through interactions to what or whom it is interacting with.
 
We can look at the mass as the substance of "who I am" as all the accumulated knowledge I have about myself and my perspective of reality, thus the property of the mass, as the knowledge it exists as can be within a starting point of the mind, and thus the "who I am" will be self interest, in such a situation, the inner force of the mass as the mass will cause it to accelerate and within the starting point of the substance of the mass as self interest, and thus will emit force of the same starting point, on the other hand, the mass can be of substance as knowledge that supports life, that recognize the natural forces in play and is aligned with all that is here as the physical, in this case the mass will accelerate itself through applying itself within the starting point of that which is best for all, within the realization that that is in fact the highest interest of self, as self is one with all that is here, and thus the force emitted by the mass would be of the same starting point, and that will reflect in all interactions, whether the interactions will be based on self interest and create friction, conflict and suffering for the mass itself as well as to others, or on the principle of equality as what is based for all - is all dependent on the property of the mass - thus, we as humanity, as individuals, have to make the decision to take self responsibility and change ourselves as the mass of knowledge that we exist in, to apply ourselves from the new starting of the self changed mass, and thus to emit a force of the same starting point firstly onto ourselves as we empower ourselves, and secondly around us as we influence and impact the world through our interaction - the choice is ours, are our interactions going to be based on the old version of ourselves, as self interest.
 
Within the Desteni Process we are provided with tools as writing and self forgiveness to support ourselves in the process of self change, from a mass that is not responsible for the force it emits, into a mass that take self responsibility and change oneself to be able to trust that the force we are participating within is supporting us as life, and all life as we are all one.
 
We must realize that at the moment it's true, we are forced by the forces around us, we are not self directive, so from this perspective we need a push to get ourselves started, this is the beauty of the Desteni Process as we are all walking our process in writing, not just for ourselves as self support, but this is how we emit force through interactions, and thus you, that are reading our blogs and hearing the Desteni Message, within the interaction, are experiencing it as a force emitted upon you, and it gives you a chance to self explore and self realize.
 

Let me brake this down on an individual level, the mass is who I am, as the mass of knowledge I exist as, and the property of the mass will indicate if I am holding on to knowledge that is aligned to the natural forces and thus of support of myself as life within the principle of what is best for all life, or is it not aligned with the natural forces, as not existing in equilibrium with the physical reality, as causing friction and conflict through self interest - the mass that I am, the property of myself, that which I exist as, will dictate how I put myself into action which is the property of acceleration, in the Desteni Process, the acceleration will be done within writing and applying self forgiveness as the application of the mass of knowledge as who I am, these properties together will determine the force I emit into and on reality, thus, if the mass as who I am is aligned with the natural forces as equality or if the mass as who I am is aligned with the mind as illation as not existing within the realm of the natural forces of reality, either way, the force I will emit will be an outflow of the starting point of myself as who I am as the mass of knowledge I exist as. Thus, the force I emit within the interactions I exist as reflect me as who I am, whether I'm aware of it or not. Better become aware and take self responsibility - don't you think?
 

Within the Desteni Process one realize what is natural force, the force of nature, of the physical, this is the reason I am walking this blog series, to bring the two points together within showing that physics supports the Desteni Message due to the simple fact that the Desteni Message is aligned with the physical, within realizing that nature, the physical, substance, all follow the laws of nature and are thus constricted to natural forces, thus, anything that contradicts the natural forces is causing friction and consequences. So our goal is to align ourselves with nature, with the forces of nature, with the physical, to realize that we are not observers but actual equal and one participants in this existence, in this ball of dust. We all are made from the same substance, we are all primarily physical, and only through the perception of the mind we believe ourselves to be separate from all that is here. An interesting point to consider is that we are mass, yet we have awareness, perhaps all mass has awareness as that would explain why the mass is in fact responsible for all the forces it is emitting and participating in, while physics has always seen it as a passive object and thus has considered only the forces acting upon it. In this series of blogs, the starting point is different, I can't say I know for a fact that all mass / substance is in fact aware, but I sure as hell can't say for a fact that it isn't, thus I will continue with following the physics to where it takes me, within allowing myself to investigate all that is here and keep that which is good, that which will be of most support for humanity to better ourselves to bring about a reality through applying ourselves in awareness to create a force that is aligned with the force of nature that will support nature and all life as a whole.



To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course

Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
 
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles

• Day 120 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion
• Day 118 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia
• Day 246: Physics and God - ADC - Part 93
• Day 121 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Scientific Paradigm
• Day 122 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion - Forces